Monday, 8 December 2008

Graffiti Tags



Digital Newsroom
Article One

Graffiti Tags

Lancashire Police in Preston and Lancaster are appealing for information after a large number of graffiti tags were reported around the city.

A graffiti ‘tag’, which is used to distinguish a graffiti artist’s work from another, is commonly seen around many cities. The Northern Division’s ‘Name the Tag’s scheme’, is run in union with Crimestoppers. Anyone who gives information about the ‘tag’s’, leading to a conviction may be eligible to claim a £100 reward.

The graffiti tags which have been reported in such areas as Lancashire Royal Grammar School, where left on the gates of the school between November 13th and November 15th. Also on November 15th a rear shutter door of a van, parked on Haylett Square, was sprayed with a graffiti tag.

This comes after only months before Preston Council had set up a new graffiti hotline to help clean up the city. An investment of £45,000 by the Council was made to provide a new graffiti cleaning van and a hotline that would enable the locals report any graffiti they had seen in there neighbourhood.

The councils aim was to help clean up Preston, helping to improve the look of the local neighbourhoods.

Preston is like many other cities and towns, where graffiti seems to have a real impact on the community and how the locals feel about the way graffiti makes there city look.

Graffiti - An unheard generation


Holly Frith
The Digital Newsroom
Article Two

Graffiti – An unheard generation

Graffiti, is it such a menace to society? The art of graffiti which has recently been given a lot of negative press due to the graffiti tags around Lancashire and other areas of the country has been around for many years, but why are people so split on the issue.

The word and concept of Graffiti means many things to different people. Some people see graffiti as an act of vandalism whilst others see it as art.

So why is Graffiti seen as vandalism to many? Much of the problem seems to be the areas which graffiti artist use as their medium. Unlike many other art forms that are displayed on a canvas, graffiti artists use places like public buildings, trains and private walls. The artist apparent lack of consideration for the medium they use is what people’s main problem is.

As Sami Montage, Editor of Graphotism magazine says about the controversy surrounding graffiti, ‘Graffiti is no one thing; it is as broad as the mix of characters doing it. It is important to consider that some elements of writing are controversial and others are not; for example, painting a piece on a legal wall, permission wall or as a comission are not at all controversial or likely to upset anyone. Painting a train, scratching or using etch on windows or painting illegally in general are more likely to cause offence and, therefore, be more controversial.’’

‘‘For some, the heart of writing lies in it's illegality, the will of an individual to express themselves freely without asking permission from anyone; this is bound to be controversial. A common thing that you'd hear from people whilst painting a wall is 'I really like the big colourful paintings, but not all that scribbling.' To a writer 'the big colourful paintings' (pieces) are just a highly elaborate version of the 'scribbles' (tags), with throw ups or dubs somewhere in the middle.’’

Graffiti started in the 1960’s, teenagers around New York wrote their names on the neighboured walls, rather than using their real names they chose nicknames, giving them a whole new and unidentified image for the street. In 1971 The New York Times published an interview with Taki 183, who lived on the 183rd Street in the Washington Heights area of Manhattan, he spray painted his name and street number every where he went.

Kids around the neighbourhood were impressed by the unsavoury reputation with the public that somebody’s name appearing over a city could cause. The idea of a competition began between youngsters. Inspired by Taki 183, they ‘tagged’ trains and public buildings around the town.

The kids that tags appeared most frequently and in the most out-of-the way places became unsung heroes of the city.

From here graffiti grew, writers experimented with size and colour, large areas were taken up which later became known as ‘pieces’. New styles of script were created, including calligraphy, block-style and bubble-style. Writers then moved on to scale and colour. Tags became larger and depth was added to create three-dimensional effects. Writers also began to add design elements to their names, including arrows, stars, clouds, and crowns.

A campaign was launched in the late 80’s by the NYC Metro Transit Authorities (MTA) to get rid of the subway system graffiti. This act was seen by many to have ended the NYC subway graffiti era. Graffiti had already begun to spread across America and into Canada and Europe.

The reason for why people get into graffiti could simply be answered by anyone. ‘‘Think about the psyche of a young male (most writers are male) trying to make his way in the world, you’d probably think of an individual trying to be heard in the world , self actualise, rebel, have fun, belong and create or destroy.’’

Graffiti is seen as ‘trendy’ at the moment with graffiti expanding to include other art forms, including stencil work, sculptures, stencils and mosaics. ‘‘some people who are not directly involved in it also like it, they probably like the more aesthetically palatable elements of it, ie. Not drippy tags. Ask yourself how many of these people would have actively claimed to like it or even to have really noticed it had it not become trendy thanks to people like Banksy etc.’’

What ever people may think about graffiti, it is simply a generation expressing there views in a society that just won’t listen.

Graffiti

I have produced a slideshow that works alongside my graffiti feature. The slideshow shows the history of graffiti and the differnt styles.

Sunday, 19 October 2008

Holiday Park Plan Rejection

There have been plans to build a hotel and dozens of chalets at a countryside park near Preston. Proposals where put forward for a total of 61 holiday cabins and a 66 bedroom hotel at the start of the year. These plans are set to be knocked back after planners recommended the idea be rejected due to its size and its central location in a green belt area.

A letter to planners from Coun Julie Winstanley said: "The parish council feels that the development would be over - intensive and is not appropriate for open countryside.

"Also, traffic would be excessive on an already dangerous road where there have been fatalities in the past.''

Monday, 29 September 2008

welcome to my blog!

Welcome to my blog!
This will be a blog about Enviroment issuses in Lancashire and the North West